Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 15:34

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Mysterious sphere named Teleios found floating in the Milky Way - Earth.com
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Lynn Hamilton Dies: ‘The Waltons’ & ‘Sanford And Son’ Actress Was 95 - Deadline
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Thank you.
Forget Commander, Clive is the core of my new MTG Final Fantasy standard deck - wargamer.com
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
U.S. Employers Are Shedding Jobs as DOGE Cuts Deep - Barron's
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Diddy trial day 21 recap: 3rd victim takes the stand as judge threatens to boot Combs - ABC News
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.